πŸ¦‘ TruLens

Snapshot 2026-08-03 23:56:39 UTC Β· version 1

● published
M
MDRSS Source Library Github collector716 cards Β· 4.7/10 MDRSS

Instrument any app with a decorator, score every step with LLM judges that explain themselves, then compare versions and ship the one that earns it. Tracing is OpenTelemetry-native, so a trace is portable to any OTLP backend, and evaluations run either as traces land or over a da

science/datasetstype:reference#ai#open-source#trulens#agents#step#every
MARKDOWN SNAPSHOT

Loading…

Direct .mdRaw + metadata0 commentsMDRSS 4.6/10
INDEXABLE MARKDOWN SNAPSHOT

Research document

Open canonical .md

πŸ¦‘ TruLens

TruLens finds where your agent fails and where you can cut cost without losing quality. Open source, OpenTelemetry-native.

Instrument any app with a decorator, score every step with LLM judges that explain themselves, then compare versions and ship the one that earns it. Tracing is OpenTelemetry-native, so a trace is portable to any OTLP backend, and evaluations run either as traces land or over a dataset after the fact.

Read more about the core concepts behind TruLens including Metrics, the RAG Triad, and Honest, Harmless and Helpful Evals.

Trace every step

Latency, inputs, outputs, tokens and cost, recorded per step, so a bad answer has a traceable cause rather than a vibe.

Compare versions, ship the frontier

Scores, latency and cost per app version, so the tradeoff is visible instead of guessed. The cheapest version is often not the worst one.

Don't take our word for it

TruLens judges are graded against human annotations, out of the box.

Result Metric Detail
95% Agent errors caught with Agent GPA on TRAIL/GAIA 267 of 281 human-annotated errors, against 55% for the baseline trace judge (arXiv:2510.08847)
0.81 Groundedness F1 on LLM-AggreFact Ahead of a fine-tuned proprietary model, Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B, on F1, precision and recall over an 11,000-example holdout (RAG triad benchmarks)
0.93 Context relevance NDCG@5 First of five tools on three of four ranking metrics, ahead of WandB Weave, RAGAS, DeepEval and UpTrain (AIMultiple, 23 March 2026)
4.2:1 Context relevance adversarial win-loss Scored the correct passage over a near-copy with one fact swapped 4.2 times for every reversal, against 3.3:1 for the next best tool (AIMultiple)

Adopted by AI teams at

Walmart Global Tech, Cisco, J.P. Morgan Chase, Equinix, VMware by Broadcom, Hitachi Digital Services, Thomson Reuters, phData, HID Global and others. See ADOPTERS.md.

Installation and Setup

Install the trulens pip package from PyPI.

pip install trulens

Install with a specific LLM provider for feedback evaluation:

pip install trulens trulens-providers-openai   # OpenAI / Azure OpenAI
pip install trulens trulens-providers-litellm  # LiteLLM (Anthropic, Cohere, Mistral, …)
pip install trulens trulens-providers-google   # Google Gemini
pip install trulens trulens-providers-bedrock  # AWS Bedrock
pip install trulens trulens-providers-cortex   # Snowflake Cortex
pip install trulens trulens-providers-huggingface  # HuggingFace
pip install trulens trulens-providers-langchain    # LangChain models

Install with a specific app framework integration:

pip install trulens trulens-apps-langchain    # LangChain / LangGraph
pip install trulens trulens-apps-llamaindex  # LlamaIndex

Quick Usage

Walk through how to instrument and evaluate a RAG built from scratch with TruLens.

Key Features

πŸ”­ OpenTelemetry-based tracing

TruLens instrumentation is built on OpenTelemetry. Every function call, LLM generation, retrieval, and tool invocation is captured as a structured OTEL span. This makes TruLens interoperable with existing observability infrastructure β€” export traces to Jaeger, Grafana Tempo, Datadog, or any OTLP-compatible backend.

from trulens.core.otel.instrument import instrument
from trulens.otel.semconv.trace import SpanAttributes

class MyRAG:
    @instrument(
        span_type=SpanAttributes.SpanType.RETRIEVAL,
        attributes={
            SpanAttributes.RETRIEVAL.QUERY_TEXT: "query",
            SpanAttributes.RETRIEVAL.RETRIEVED_CONTEXTS: "return",
        },
    )
    def retrieve(self, query: str) -> list:
        ...

πŸ€– Agentic evaluations

Seven purpose-built evaluators for agentic systems β€” each measuring a distinct aspect of agent behavior:

Evaluator What it measures
LogicalConsistency Reasoning coherence; flags hallucinations and unsupported assertions
ExecutionEfficiency Redundant steps, unnecessary retries, wasted computation
PlanAdherence Whether execution followed the stated plan
PlanQuality Intrinsic plan quality β€” strategy, not outcome
ToolSelection Right tool chosen for each subtask
ToolCalling Argument validity and output interpretation
ToolQuality External tool/service reliability

πŸ“Š Batch and inline evaluation

Run evaluations alongside your app, on existing data, or in offline batch mode:

# Inline β€” evaluate as the app runs
with tru_recorder as recording:
    response = my_app.query("What is TruLens?")

# Batch β€” evaluate a pre-collected dataset using the Run API
from trulens.core.run import RunConfig

run_config = RunConfig(
    run_name="batch_eval_v1",
    dataset_name="eval_questions",
    source_type="TABLE",
    dataset_spec={"input": "QUESTION"},
    invocation_max_workers=8,
    metric_max_workers=4,
)
run = tru_app.add_run(run_config=run_config)
run.start()
run.compute_metrics([relevance, groundedness])

πŸ”Œ MCP support

Instrument Model Context Protocol tool calls with the MCP span type to capture tool name, arguments, output, and latency:

@instrument(span_type=SpanAttributes.SpanType.MCP)
def call_mcp_tool(self, tool_name: str, arguments: dict) -> str:
    ...

🎯 Selector API

Target any span attribute for evaluation using the flexible Selector API:

from trulens.core import Metric, Selector

f_context_relevance = Metric(
    name="Context Relevance",
    implementation=provider.context_relevance,
    selectors={
        "input": Selector.select_record_input(),
        "context": Selector.select_context(),
    },
)

Supported LLM Providers

Provider Package
OpenAI / Azure OpenAI trulens-providers-openai
LiteLLM (Anthropic, Cohere, Mistral, and more) trulens-providers-litellm
Google Gemini trulens-providers-google
AWS Bedrock trulens-providers-bedrock
Snowflake Cortex trulens-providers-cortex
HuggingFace trulens-providers-huggingface
LangChain models trulens-providers-langchain

πŸ’‘ Contributing & Community

Interested in contributing? See our contributing guide for more details.

The best way to support TruLens is to give us a ⭐ on GitHub and join our discourse community!

MARKDOWN METRICS
611words
17headings
25links
7code blocks
MDRSS ASSESSMENT
Evidence46/100medium confidence
Why MDRSS assigned this score
  • Production catalog audit 2026-08-04
  • Taxonomy classified from title, annotation, source and Markdown signals
  • Agent usefulness evaluated from structure, procedures, examples, evidence and retrieval value
Evidence (1)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion.