langchain-architecture — detailed patterns and worked examples

Snapshot 2026-08-04 16:17:00 UTC · version 1

published
C
Collider.club487 cards · 9.8/10 MDRSS

langchain-architecture — detailed patterns and worked examples captures reusable agent playbook guidance for agent design & orchestration. Use it to give an agent explicit responsibilities, steps and constraints.

MARKDOWN SNAPSHOT

Loading…

Direct .mdRaw + metadata0 commentsMDRSS 9.8/10
INDEXABLE MARKDOWN SNAPSHOT

Research document

Open canonical .md

langchain-architecture — detailed patterns and worked examples

langchain-architecture — detailed patterns and worked examples captures reusable agent playbook guidance for agent design & orchestration. Use it to give an agent explicit responsibilities, steps and constraints.

Editorial note: curated source snapshot published by Collider.club under the MIT License. Source attribution is preserved in the front matter.

Source snapshot

langchain-architecture — detailed patterns and worked examples

Architecture Patterns

Pattern 1: RAG with LangGraph

from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END
from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic
from langchain_voyageai import VoyageAIEmbeddings
from langchain_pinecone import PineconeVectorStore
from langchain_core.documents import Document
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from typing import TypedDict, Annotated

class RAGState(TypedDict):
    question: str
    context: Annotated[list[Document], "retrieved documents"]
    answer: str

# Initialize components
llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-5")
embeddings = VoyageAIEmbeddings(model="voyage-3-large")
vectorstore = PineconeVectorStore(index_name="docs", embedding=embeddings)
retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 4})

# Define nodes
async def retrieve(state: RAGState) -> RAGState:
    """Retrieve relevant documents."""
    docs = await retriever.ainvoke(state["question"])
    return {"context": docs}

async def generate(state: RAGState) -> RAGState:
    """Generate answer from context."""
    prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template(
        """Answer based on the context below. If you cannot answer, say so.

        Context: {context}

        Question: {question}

        Answer:"""
    )
    context_text = "\n\n".join(doc.page_content for doc in state["context"])
    response = await llm.ainvoke(
        prompt.format(context=context_text, question=state["question"])
    )
    return {"answer": response.content}

# Build graph
builder = StateGraph(RAGState)
builder.add_node("retrieve", retrieve)
builder.add_node("generate", generate)
builder.add_edge(START, "retrieve")
builder.add_edge("retrieve", "generate")
builder.add_edge("generate", END)

rag_chain = builder.compile()

# Use the chain
result = await rag_chain.ainvoke({"question": "What is the main topic?"})

Pattern 2: Custom Agent with Structured Tools

from langchain_core.tools import StructuredTool
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class SearchInput(BaseModel):
    """Input for database search."""
    query: str = Field(description="Search query")
    filters: dict = Field(default={}, description="Optional filters")

class EmailInput(BaseModel):
    """Input for sending email."""
    recipient: str = Field(description="Email recipient")
    subject: str = Field(description="Email subject")
    content: str = Field(description="Email body")

async def search_database(query: str, filters: dict = {}) -> str:
    """Search internal database for information."""
    # Your database search logic
    return f"Results for '{query}' with filters {filters}"

async def send_email(recipient: str, subject: str, content: str) -> str:
    """Send an email to specified recipient."""
    # Email sending logic
    return f"Email sent to {recipient}"

tools = [
    StructuredTool.from_function(
        coroutine=search_database,
        name="search_database",
        description="Search internal database",
        args_schema=SearchInput
    ),
    StructuredTool.from_function(
        coroutine=send_email,
        name="send_email",
        description="Send an email",
        args_schema=EmailInput
    )
]

agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools)

Pattern 3: Multi-Step Workflow with StateGraph

from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END
from typing import TypedDict, Literal

class WorkflowState(TypedDict):
    text: str
    entities: list
    analysis: str
    summary: str
    current_step: str

async def extract_entities(state: WorkflowState) -> WorkflowState:
    """Extract key entities from text."""
    prompt = f"Extract key entities from: {state['text']}\n\nReturn as JSON list."
    response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt)
    return {"entities": response.content, "current_step": "analyze"}

async def analyze_entities(state: WorkflowState) -> WorkflowState:
    """Analyze extracted entities."""
    prompt = f"Analyze these entities: {state['entities']}\n\nProvide insights."
    response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt)
    return {"analysis": response.content, "current_step": "summarize"}

async def generate_summary(state: WorkflowState) -> WorkflowState:
    """Generate final summary."""
    prompt = f"""Summarize:
    Entities: {state['entities']}
    Analysis: {state['analysis']}

    Provide a concise summary."""
    response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt)
    return {"summary": response.content, "current_step": "complete"}

def route_step(state: WorkflowState) -> Literal["analyze", "summarize", "end"]:
    """Route to next step based on current state."""
    step = state.get("current_step", "extract")
    if step == "analyze":
        return "analyze"
    elif step == "summarize":
        return "summarize"
    return "end"

# Build workflow
builder = StateGraph(WorkflowState)
builder.add_node("extract", extract_entities)
builder.add_node("analyze", analyze_entities)
builder.add_node("summarize", generate_summary)

builder.add_edge(START, "extract")
builder.add_conditional_edges("extract", route_step, {
    "analyze": "analyze",
    "summarize": "summarize",
    "end": END
})
builder.add_conditional_edges("analyze", route_step, {
    "summarize": "summarize",
    "end": END
})
builder.add_edge("summarize", END)

workflow = builder.compile()

Pattern 4: Multi-Agent Orchestration

from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END
from langgraph.prebuilt import create_react_agent
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
from typing import Literal

class MultiAgentState(TypedDict):
    messages: list
    next_agent: str

# Create specialized agents
researcher = create_react_agent(llm, research_tools)
writer = create_react_agent(llm, writing_tools)
reviewer = create_react_agent(llm, review_tools)

async def supervisor(state: MultiAgentState) -> MultiAgentState:
    """Route to appropriate agent based on task."""
    prompt = f"""Based on the conversation, which agent should handle this?

    Options:
    - researcher: For finding information
    - writer: For creating content
    - reviewer: For reviewing and editing
    - FINISH: Task is complete

    Messages: {state['messages']}

    Respond with just the agent name."""

    response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt)
    return {"next_agent": response.content.strip().lower()}

def route_to_agent(state: MultiAgentState) -> Literal["researcher", "writer", "reviewer", "end"]:
    """Route based on supervisor decision."""
    next_agent = state.get("next_agent", "").lower()
    if next_agent == "finish":
        return "end"
    return next_agent if next_agent in ["researcher", "writer", "reviewer"] else "end"

# Build multi-agent graph
builder = StateGraph(MultiAgentState)
builder.add_node("supervisor", supervisor)
builder.add_node("researcher", researcher)
builder.add_node("writer", writer)
builder.add_node("reviewer", reviewer)

builder.add_edge(START, "supervisor")
builder.add_conditional_edges("supervisor", route_to_agent, {
    "researcher": "researcher",
    "writer": "writer",
    "reviewer": "reviewer",
    "end": END
})

# Each agent returns to supervisor
for agent in ["researcher", "writer", "reviewer"]:
    builder.add_edge(agent, "supervisor")

multi_agent = builder.compile()

Memory Management

Token-Based Memory with LangGraph

from langgraph.checkpoint.memory import MemorySaver
from langgraph.prebuilt import create_react_agent

# In-memory checkpointer (development)
checkpointer = MemorySaver()

# Create agent with persistent memory
agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools, checkpointer=checkpointer)

# Each thread_id maintains separate conversation
config = {"configurable": {"thread_id": "session-abc123"}}

# Messages persist across invocations with same thread_id
result1 = await agent.ainvoke({"messages": [("user", "My name is Alice")]}, config)
result2 = await agent.ainvoke({"messages": [("user", "What's my name?")]}, config)
# Agent remembers: "Your name is Alice"

Production Memory with PostgreSQL

from langgraph.checkpoint.postgres import PostgresSaver

# Production checkpointer
checkpointer = PostgresSaver.from_conn_string(
    "postgresql://user:pass@localhost/langgraph"
)

agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools, checkpointer=checkpointer)

Vector Store Memory for Long-Term Context

from langchain_community.vectorstores import Chroma
from langchain_voyageai import VoyageAIEmbeddings

embeddings = VoyageAIEmbeddings(model="voyage-3-large")
memory_store = Chroma(
    collection_name="conversation_memory",
    embedding_function=embeddings,
    persist_directory="./memory_db"
)

async def retrieve_relevant_memory(query: str, k: int = 5) -> list:
    """Retrieve relevant past conversations."""
    docs = await memory_store.asimilarity_search(query, k=k)
    return [doc.page_content for doc in docs]

async def store_memory(content: str, metadata: dict = {}):
    """Store conversation in long-term memory."""
    await memory_store.aadd_texts([content], metadatas=[metadata])

Callback System & LangSmith

LangSmith Tracing

import os
from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic

# Enable LangSmith tracing
os.environ["LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2"] = "true"
os.environ["LANGCHAIN_API_KEY"] = "your-api-key"
os.environ["LANGCHAIN_PROJECT"] = "my-project"

# All LangChain/LangGraph operations are automatically traced
llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-5")

Custom Callback Handler

from langchain_core.callbacks import BaseCallbackHandler
from typing import Any, Dict, List

class CustomCallbackHandler(BaseCallbackHandler):
    def on_llm_start(
        self, serialized: Dict[str, Any], prompts: List[str], **kwargs
    ) -> None:
        print(f"LLM started with {len(prompts)} prompts")

    def on_llm_end(self, response, **kwargs) -> None:
        print(f"LLM completed: {len(response.generations)} generations")

    def on_llm_error(self, error: Exception, **kwargs) -> None:
        print(f"LLM error: {error}")

    def on_tool_start(
        self, serialized: Dict[str, Any], input_str: str, **kwargs
    ) -> None:
        print(f"Tool started: {serialized.get('name')}")

    def on_tool_end(self, output: str, **kwargs) -> None:
        print(f"Tool completed: {output[:100]}...")

# Use callbacks
result = await agent.ainvoke(
    {"messages": [("user", "query")]},
    config={"callbacks": [CustomCallbackHandler()]}
)

Streaming Responses

from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic

llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-5", streaming=True)

# Stream tokens
async for chunk in llm.astream("Tell me a story"):
    print(chunk.content, end="", flush=True)

# Stream agent events
async for event in agent.astream_events(
    {"messages": [("user", "Search and summarize")]},
    version="v2"
):
    if event["event"] == "on_chat_model_stream":
        print(event["data"]["chunk"].content, end="")
    elif event["event"] == "on_tool_start":
        print(f"\n[Using tool: {event['name']}]")

About Collider.club

This card belongs to the curated knowledge base of Collider.club — a closed business club for entrepreneurs, engineers, investors and domain experts building projects for international markets. Members work across DeFi, AI/ML, FinTech, Web3, banking, hardware and venture capital, and the club runs closed sessions on high-margin niches with anonymous speakers.

  • Club: https://collider.club
  • Collection: Collider.club curated card library (mdrss-card/v2)
  • Maintainer: Collider.club editorial team

License

MIT License — Copyright (c) 2026 Collider.club. Full text: LICENSE · https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

MARKDOWN METRICS
202words
37headings
3links
10code blocks
MDRSS ASSESSMENT
Scam / risk5/100low
Evidence100/100high confidence
Why MDRSS assigned this score
  • evidence comes from multiple domains
  • some evidence URLs look like primary-source hosts
Evidence (4)
concept:agent-design-and-orchestrationorg:collider-club

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion.