Snapshot 2026-08-04 16:17:00 UTC · version 1
Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows. Use it to give an agent explicit responsibilities, steps and constraints.
Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows. Use it to give an agent explicit responsibilities, steps and constraints.
Editorial note: curated source snapshot published by Collider.club under the MIT License. Source attribution is preserved in the front matter.
Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows.
Command: /team-spawn review
agent-teams:team-reviewer| Name | Dimension | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
| security-reviewer | Security | Input validation, auth, injection, secrets, CVEs |
| performance-reviewer | Performance | Query efficiency, memory, caching, async patterns |
| architecture-reviewer | Architecture | SOLID, coupling, patterns, error handling |
Subject: Review {target} for {dimension} issues
Description:
Dimension: {dimension}
Target: {file list or diff}
Checklist: {dimension-specific checklist}
Output format: Structured findings with file:line, severity, evidence, fix
--reviewers security,testing (2 members)--reviewers security,performance,architecture,testing,accessibility (5 members)--reviewers architecture,testing,accessibility (3 members)Command: /team-spawn debug
--hypotheses Nagent-teams:team-debugger| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| investigator-1 | Investigates hypothesis 1 |
| investigator-2 | Investigates hypothesis 2 |
| investigator-3 | Investigates hypothesis 3 |
Subject: Investigate hypothesis: {hypothesis summary}
Description:
Hypothesis: {full hypothesis statement}
Scope: {files/module/project}
Evidence criteria:
Confirming: {what would confirm}
Falsifying: {what would falsify}
Report format: confidence level, evidence with file:line, causal chain
Command: /team-spawn feature
agent-teams:team-lead + agent-teams:team-implementer| Name | Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| feature-lead | team-lead | Decomposition, coordination, integration |
| implementer-1 | team-implementer | Work stream 1 (assigned files) |
| implementer-2 | team-implementer | Work stream 2 (assigned files) |
Subject: Implement {work stream name}
Description:
Owned files: {explicit file list}
Requirements: {specific deliverables}
Interface contract: {shared types/APIs}
Acceptance criteria: {verification steps}
Blocked by: {dependency task IDs if any}
Command: /team-spawn fullstack
agent-teams:team-lead + 3x agent-teams:team-implementer| Name | Role | Layer |
|---|---|---|
| fullstack-lead | team-lead | Coordination, integration |
| frontend-dev | team-implementer | UI components, client-side logic |
| backend-dev | team-implementer | API endpoints, business logic |
| test-dev | team-implementer | Unit, integration, e2e tests |
frontend-dev ──┐
├──→ test-dev (blocked by both)
backend-dev ──┘
Command: /team-spawn research
general-purpose| Name | Role | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| researcher-1 | general-purpose | Research area 1 (e.g., codebase architecture) |
| researcher-2 | general-purpose | Research area 2 (e.g., library documentation) |
| researcher-3 | general-purpose | Research area 3 (e.g., web resources & examples) |
Each researcher has access to:
Grep, Glob, Read — search and read local filesWebSearch, WebFetch — search the web and fetch page contentTask with subagent_type: Explore — spawn sub-explorers for deep divesSubject: Research {topic or question}
Description:
Question: {specific research question}
Scope: {codebase files, web resources, library docs, or all}
Tools to prioritize:
- Codebase: Grep/Glob/Read for local code analysis
- Web: WebSearch/WebFetch for articles, examples, best practices
Deliverable: Summary with citations (file:line for code, URLs for web)
Output format: Structured report with sections, evidence, and recommendations
Researcher 1 (codebase): "How does our current auth system work? Trace the flow from login to token validation."
Researcher 2 (web): "Search for comparisons between NextAuth, Clerk, and Auth0 for Next.js apps. Focus on pricing, DX, and migration effort."
Researcher 3 (docs): "Look up the latest NextAuth.js v5 API docs. How does it handle JWT and session management?"
Command: /team-spawn security
agent-teams:team-reviewer| Name | Dimension | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
| vuln-reviewer | OWASP/Vulns | Injection, XSS, CSRF, deserialization, SSRF |
| auth-reviewer | Auth/Access | Authentication, authorization, session management |
| deps-reviewer | Dependencies | CVEs, supply chain, outdated packages, license risks |
| config-reviewer | Secrets/Config | Hardcoded secrets, env vars, debug endpoints, CORS |
Subject: Security audit {target} for {dimension}
Description:
Dimension: {security sub-dimension}
Target: {file list, directory, or entire project}
Checklist: {dimension-specific security checklist}
Output format: Structured findings with file:line, CVSS-like severity, evidence, remediation
Standards: OWASP Top 10, CWE references where applicable
--reviewers owasp,secrets (2 members for fast audit)Command: /team-spawn migration
agent-teams:team-lead + 2x agent-teams:team-implementer + agent-teams:team-reviewer| Name | Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| migration-lead | team-lead | Migration plan, coordination, conflict handling |
| migrator-1 | team-implementer | Migration stream 1 (assigned files/modules) |
| migrator-2 | team-implementer | Migration stream 2 (assigned files/modules) |
| migration-verify | team-reviewer | Verify migrated code correctness and patterns |
Subject: Migrate {module/files} from {old} to {new}
Description:
Owned files: {explicit file list}
Migration rules: {specific transformation patterns}
Old pattern: {what to change from}
New pattern: {what to change to}
Acceptance criteria: {tests pass, no regressions, new patterns used}
Blocked by: {dependency task IDs if any}
migration-lead (plan) → migrator-1 ──┐
→ migrator-2 ──┼→ migration-verify
┘
This card belongs to the curated knowledge base of Collider.club — a closed business club for entrepreneurs, engineers, investors and domain experts building projects for international markets. Members work across DeFi, AI/ML, FinTech, Web3, banking, hardware and venture capital, and the club runs closed sessions on high-margin niches with anonymous speakers.
mdrss-card/v2)MIT License — Copyright (c) 2026 Collider.club. Full text: LICENSE · https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
concept:agent-design-and-orchestrationorg:collider-club Sign in to join the discussion.
Snapshot 2026-08-04 16:17:00 UTC · version 1
Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows. Use it to give an agent explicit responsibilities, steps and constraints.
Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows. Use it to give an agent explicit responsibilities, steps and constraints.
Editorial note: curated source snapshot published by Collider.club under the MIT License. Source attribution is preserved in the front matter.
Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows.
Command: /team-spawn review
agent-teams:team-reviewer| Name | Dimension | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
| security-reviewer | Security | Input validation, auth, injection, secrets, CVEs |
| performance-reviewer | Performance | Query efficiency, memory, caching, async patterns |
| architecture-reviewer | Architecture | SOLID, coupling, patterns, error handling |
Subject: Review {target} for {dimension} issues
Description:
Dimension: {dimension}
Target: {file list or diff}
Checklist: {dimension-specific checklist}
Output format: Structured findings with file:line, severity, evidence, fix
--reviewers security,testing (2 members)--reviewers security,performance,architecture,testing,accessibility (5 members)--reviewers architecture,testing,accessibility (3 members)Command: /team-spawn debug
--hypotheses Nagent-teams:team-debugger| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| investigator-1 | Investigates hypothesis 1 |
| investigator-2 | Investigates hypothesis 2 |
| investigator-3 | Investigates hypothesis 3 |
Subject: Investigate hypothesis: {hypothesis summary}
Description:
Hypothesis: {full hypothesis statement}
Scope: {files/module/project}
Evidence criteria:
Confirming: {what would confirm}
Falsifying: {what would falsify}
Report format: confidence level, evidence with file:line, causal chain
Command: /team-spawn feature
agent-teams:team-lead + agent-teams:team-implementer| Name | Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| feature-lead | team-lead | Decomposition, coordination, integration |
| implementer-1 | team-implementer | Work stream 1 (assigned files) |
| implementer-2 | team-implementer | Work stream 2 (assigned files) |
Subject: Implement {work stream name}
Description:
Owned files: {explicit file list}
Requirements: {specific deliverables}
Interface contract: {shared types/APIs}
Acceptance criteria: {verification steps}
Blocked by: {dependency task IDs if any}
Command: /team-spawn fullstack
agent-teams:team-lead + 3x agent-teams:team-implementer| Name | Role | Layer |
|---|---|---|
| fullstack-lead | team-lead | Coordination, integration |
| frontend-dev | team-implementer | UI components, client-side logic |
| backend-dev | team-implementer | API endpoints, business logic |
| test-dev | team-implementer | Unit, integration, e2e tests |
frontend-dev ──┐
├──→ test-dev (blocked by both)
backend-dev ──┘
Command: /team-spawn research
general-purpose| Name | Role | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| researcher-1 | general-purpose | Research area 1 (e.g., codebase architecture) |
| researcher-2 | general-purpose | Research area 2 (e.g., library documentation) |
| researcher-3 | general-purpose | Research area 3 (e.g., web resources & examples) |
Each researcher has access to:
Grep, Glob, Read — search and read local filesWebSearch, WebFetch — search the web and fetch page contentTask with subagent_type: Explore — spawn sub-explorers for deep divesSubject: Research {topic or question}
Description:
Question: {specific research question}
Scope: {codebase files, web resources, library docs, or all}
Tools to prioritize:
- Codebase: Grep/Glob/Read for local code analysis
- Web: WebSearch/WebFetch for articles, examples, best practices
Deliverable: Summary with citations (file:line for code, URLs for web)
Output format: Structured report with sections, evidence, and recommendations
Researcher 1 (codebase): "How does our current auth system work? Trace the flow from login to token validation."
Researcher 2 (web): "Search for comparisons between NextAuth, Clerk, and Auth0 for Next.js apps. Focus on pricing, DX, and migration effort."
Researcher 3 (docs): "Look up the latest NextAuth.js v5 API docs. How does it handle JWT and session management?"
Command: /team-spawn security
agent-teams:team-reviewer| Name | Dimension | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
| vuln-reviewer | OWASP/Vulns | Injection, XSS, CSRF, deserialization, SSRF |
| auth-reviewer | Auth/Access | Authentication, authorization, session management |
| deps-reviewer | Dependencies | CVEs, supply chain, outdated packages, license risks |
| config-reviewer | Secrets/Config | Hardcoded secrets, env vars, debug endpoints, CORS |
Subject: Security audit {target} for {dimension}
Description:
Dimension: {security sub-dimension}
Target: {file list, directory, or entire project}
Checklist: {dimension-specific security checklist}
Output format: Structured findings with file:line, CVSS-like severity, evidence, remediation
Standards: OWASP Top 10, CWE references where applicable
--reviewers owasp,secrets (2 members for fast audit)Command: /team-spawn migration
agent-teams:team-lead + 2x agent-teams:team-implementer + agent-teams:team-reviewer| Name | Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| migration-lead | team-lead | Migration plan, coordination, conflict handling |
| migrator-1 | team-implementer | Migration stream 1 (assigned files/modules) |
| migrator-2 | team-implementer | Migration stream 2 (assigned files/modules) |
| migration-verify | team-reviewer | Verify migrated code correctness and patterns |
Subject: Migrate {module/files} from {old} to {new}
Description:
Owned files: {explicit file list}
Migration rules: {specific transformation patterns}
Old pattern: {what to change from}
New pattern: {what to change to}
Acceptance criteria: {tests pass, no regressions, new patterns used}
Blocked by: {dependency task IDs if any}
migration-lead (plan) → migrator-1 ──┐
→ migrator-2 ──┼→ migration-verify
┘
This card belongs to the curated knowledge base of Collider.club — a closed business club for entrepreneurs, engineers, investors and domain experts building projects for international markets. Members work across DeFi, AI/ML, FinTech, Web3, banking, hardware and venture capital, and the club runs closed sessions on high-margin niches with anonymous speakers.
mdrss-card/v2)MIT License — Copyright (c) 2026 Collider.club. Full text: LICENSE · https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
concept:agent-design-and-orchestrationorg:collider-club Sign in to join the discussion.